Primary care practices often face challenges when billing for services provided during an annual physical, especially when patients present with separate medical issues that require attention during the same visit. One of the most effective ways to capture revenue for these additional services is by using Modifier 25. This modifier allows practices to bill for both the preventive service (the physical) and a separate office visit code (such as 99213 or 99214) for evaluation and management of the patient’s medical concerns. However, the correct use of Modifier 25 is essential to avoid denials and ensure compliance with various insurance rules.
In this blog, we’ll walk through how to properly add office visit codes to annual physicals, provide tips for correct use of Modifier 25, and discuss how different insurers handle these services.
Understanding the Role of Modifier 25
Modifier 25 is used to indicate that a significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management (E/M) service was performed by the provider on the same day as another service (such as a preventive exam). In the context of an annual physical, this allows you to bill for both the preventive service (typically coded under CPT codes 99381-99397) and an additional office visit code (such as 99213 or 99214) if the patient presents with a problem or concern that requires further evaluation and management.
When should you use Modifier 25?
If a patient comes in for an annual physical but also presents with a medical issue—such as hypertension, back pain, or a skin rash—that requires significant time and evaluation.
The condition being evaluated must be separately identifiable from the routine preventive exam. For example, if the provider performs a focused history and exam, discusses treatment options, or orders diagnostic tests related to the problem, this qualifies as a separate service.
Key to success:
Clear, detailed documentation is critical to justify the use of Modifier 25. The notes should clearly indicate that a separate service was provided and that it was distinct from the preventive exam.
How Insurers Handle Billing with Modifier 25
Different insurance companies have varying rules when it comes to paying for office visits that are billed alongside annual physicals using Modifier 25. Understanding these variations is key to reducing denials and maximizing reimbursement.
Medicare:
Medicare allows billing for both the Annual Wellness Visit (AWV) and an additional office visit using Modifier 25 if the patient presents with a separate medical concern. However, be mindful of Medicare’s strict documentation requirements. The additional service must be medically necessary, and the provider should clearly document the time spent and the distinct nature of the E/M service.
Commercial Insurers:
Many private insurers follow a similar approach, allowing practices to bill for an additional office visit if Modifier 25 is used appropriately. However, payer policies vary. Some insurers may scrutinize claims with Modifier 25 more heavily, while others may pay for both services without issue as long as the documentation supports the claim.
It’s important to stay up-to-date on each insurer’s specific guidelines, as some may have additional requirements for documentation or may limit the frequency with which you can bill using Modifier 25.
Common Challenges:
Some payers may bundle the office visit into the preventive service, denying the additional E/M code even if Modifier 25 is used. This is more likely to occur if the documentation isn’t detailed enough to support that a separately identifiable service was performed.
Practices should also be cautious about overusing Modifier 25. Frequent use without proper justification can trigger audits and increase scrutiny from payers.
Best Practices:
Ensure that all medical concerns are documented as separate from the preventive exam.
Include detailed notes on the E/M service, such as the reason for the visit, treatment provided, and time spent.
Familiarize your billing team with the nuances of each insurer’s policy on Modifier 25.
Alternatives to Adding Office Visit Codes to Annual Physicals
In some cases, it may be beneficial to avoid adding an office visit code to an annual physical altogether. One alternative approach is to schedule a separate visit for the medical issue, particularly if the concern is complex or requires extensive evaluation and management.
Why consider splitting the visits?
Avoid payer scrutiny: Some insurers may be more likely to deny a claim when an office visit is added to a physical, even with Modifier 25. Scheduling a follow-up visit allows the practice to focus solely on the medical issue, which can reduce the chance of denials.
Clearer documentation: Separating the visits ensures that each encounter is well-documented and distinct, reducing the likelihood of audits.
Improved patient care: If the medical issue requires significant attention, scheduling a follow-up visit may allow the provider to offer more focused, thorough care.
Best Practice for Splitting Visits:
If the patient presents with a concern during the physical, explain to them that scheduling a separate visit for the medical issue may be more appropriate. This way, the provider can fully address the problem without rushing through the visit.
Conclusion: Mastering Modifier 25 for Annual Physicals\
Using Modifier 25 to add office visit codes to annual physicals can help your practice capture revenue for additional services while providing thorough care to your patients. However, the key to success lies in proper documentation and understanding the nuances of how insurers handle these claims.
By knowing when and how to use Modifier 25, training your team to document accurately, and staying current with payer policies, you can reduce denials and ensure that your practice is fairly reimbursed for the services you provide.
And remember—when in doubt, consider scheduling a separate visit to address medical concerns, ensuring clearer documentation and reducing potential payer issues.
Comments